Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CCT-2 Final standings.

Author: Lonnie Cook

Date: 05:08:32 11/06/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 06, 2000 at 05:31:33, pavel wrote:

>On November 06, 2000 at 05:28:58, Aaron Tay wrote:
>
>>On November 05, 2000 at 22:52:39, pavel wrote:
>>
>>>On November 05, 2000 at 20:04:03, Peter Skinner wrote:
>>>
>>>>On November 05, 2000 at 19:37:34, Netsurfer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Standings
>>>>>Place Name         Feder Rtg  Loc Score M-Buch. Buch. Progr.
>>>>>
>>>>>  1   ShredderX,         1900     6.5      30.5  40.0   31.5
>>>>> 2-5  NimzoX,            1800     5.5      30.0  39.5   25.0
>>>>>      Crafty,            2000     5.5      27.5  37.5   25.0
>>>>>      JuniorX,           1600     5.5      27.0  35.5   26.0
>>>>>      LambChop,          1300     5.5      26.5  35.0   22.0
>>>>>  6   DiepX,             1400     5        27.5  37.0   25.0
>>>>> 7-9  StormX,            900      4.5      29.0  39.0   19.5
>>>>>      ZChess,            100      4.5      24.0  33.5   21.0
>>>>>      InsomniacX,        1700     4.5      23.0  30.5   18.5
>>>>>10-11 Yace,              200      4        23.5  29.0   18.5
>>>>>      Amateur,           1500     4        20.5  27.0   18.0
>>>>>12-15 ArasanX,           700      3.5      27.0  36.0   18.5
>>>>>      Hossa,             1000     3.5      26.0  34.5   19.0
>>>>>      Sjeng,             400      3.5      22.5  27.5   14.5
>>>>>      TerraX,            300      3.5      19.0  24.5   11.5
>>>>>16-18 Tinker,            1100     3        22.5  28.0   14.0
>>>>>      AvernoX,           800      3        22.0  27.5   11.0
>>>>>      ShrikeX,           1200     3        20.0  24.5   13.5
>>>>> 19   Dorky,             600      2        22.5  28.0    8.0
>>>>> 20   Mint,              500      0        20.0  26.0    0.0
>>>>
>>>>I think this was a very good result for Shredder. Equally, I am impressed with
>>>>Nimzox, Lambchop ( Wow, great result ), and Diepx.
>>>>
>>>>I think if in the future that Diep has these type results, I may have to eat my
>>>>words about the program.
>>>
>>>yes, DIEP was impressive
>>>esp. the game against nimxox, where diep clearly saw the draw far ahead, and
>>>nimzo still showing 1.28 for itself.
>>>
>>>Nimzox had high 'nps' on a a 1000mhz machine, but I am still surprised that it
>>>turned second. As I wasn't much impressed by it's game.
>>>
>>>shredderx is the real hero, this guy is still using shredder4
>>>
>>>to me impressive was the result of zchess23 and lambchop.
>>>
>>>
>>>Pavs ;)
>>
>>What about storm X?
>
>I dont know much about this program but it sure was runnign ona  nice cluster
>machine :)
>better than the one bob was using.

what was hitting for nps on the average?
>
>Pavel



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.