Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:02:19 11/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 06, 2000 at 00:23:55, kurt wrote: >>Replaying Nimzo vs Crafty highlights the need for >>improving craftys book lines. >>Craftys allowed Hossa a book draw.Choice of opening >> a no no against a lower rated opponent. >>Against Shredder it was out of book in 14 moves >>with a minus score. >>With a better book Crafty would have won first place. >>Kurt Widmann This wasn't a case of my getting "robbed". I don't do a lot of opening preparation, but I do do _some_. But in this case, as I mentioned elsewhere, we had a medical emergency (not in my immediate family) that caused me to leave before round 3 was over. Since I didn't know who I would play, nor which color I would be playing in round 4, I had to real way to prepare anything. When I play something cooked up by Alex, I know that I can't play traditional stuff as he is too well-prepared for that. However, I didn't know that I would be playing him in round 4, and as a result, I used the normal book, which just happened to cough up the center counter. Nimzo is not weak, it could well have beaten me whether I played a better opening or not. That is impossible to speculate about. It is possible that I would have lost quicker had I played something I wanted to play. It is possible that I would have won with a better opening. And of course, it is also possible the game would have ended in a draw. It was just one tournament/game. I don't lose sleep over that. I wasn't happy with the majority of the book positions I reached, but I was happy with the play of Crafty after the program had to think on its own. Except maybe for the nimzo game. I think it misplayed that even after leaving the book.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.