Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CCT-2 Final standings.

Author: Sean Empey

Date: 09:44:36 11/06/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 06, 2000 at 08:08:32, Lonnie Cook wrote:

>On November 06, 2000 at 05:31:33, pavel wrote:
>
>>On November 06, 2000 at 05:28:58, Aaron Tay wrote:
>>
>>>On November 05, 2000 at 22:52:39, pavel wrote:
>>>
>>>>On November 05, 2000 at 20:04:03, Peter Skinner wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On November 05, 2000 at 19:37:34, Netsurfer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Standings
>>>>>>Place Name         Feder Rtg  Loc Score M-Buch. Buch. Progr.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  1   ShredderX,         1900     6.5      30.5  40.0   31.5
>>>>>> 2-5  NimzoX,            1800     5.5      30.0  39.5   25.0
>>>>>>      Crafty,            2000     5.5      27.5  37.5   25.0
>>>>>>      JuniorX,           1600     5.5      27.0  35.5   26.0
>>>>>>      LambChop,          1300     5.5      26.5  35.0   22.0
>>>>>>  6   DiepX,             1400     5        27.5  37.0   25.0
>>>>>> 7-9  StormX,            900      4.5      29.0  39.0   19.5
>>>>>>      ZChess,            100      4.5      24.0  33.5   21.0
>>>>>>      InsomniacX,        1700     4.5      23.0  30.5   18.5
>>>>>>10-11 Yace,              200      4        23.5  29.0   18.5
>>>>>>      Amateur,           1500     4        20.5  27.0   18.0
>>>>>>12-15 ArasanX,           700      3.5      27.0  36.0   18.5
>>>>>>      Hossa,             1000     3.5      26.0  34.5   19.0
>>>>>>      Sjeng,             400      3.5      22.5  27.5   14.5
>>>>>>      TerraX,            300      3.5      19.0  24.5   11.5
>>>>>>16-18 Tinker,            1100     3        22.5  28.0   14.0
>>>>>>      AvernoX,           800      3        22.0  27.5   11.0
>>>>>>      ShrikeX,           1200     3        20.0  24.5   13.5
>>>>>> 19   Dorky,             600      2        22.5  28.0    8.0
>>>>>> 20   Mint,              500      0        20.0  26.0    0.0
>>>>>
>>>>>I think this was a very good result for Shredder. Equally, I am impressed with
>>>>>Nimzox, Lambchop ( Wow, great result ), and Diepx.
>>>>>
>>>>>I think if in the future that Diep has these type results, I may have to eat my
>>>>>words about the program.
>>>>
>>>>yes, DIEP was impressive
>>>>esp. the game against nimxox, where diep clearly saw the draw far ahead, and
>>>>nimzo still showing 1.28 for itself.
>>>>
>>>>Nimzox had high 'nps' on a a 1000mhz machine, but I am still surprised that it
>>>>turned second. As I wasn't much impressed by it's game.
>>>>
>>>>shredderx is the real hero, this guy is still using shredder4
>>>>
>>>>to me impressive was the result of zchess23 and lambchop.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Pavs ;)
>>>
>>>What about storm X?
>>
>>I dont know much about this program but it sure was runnign ona  nice cluster
>>machine :)
>>better than the one bob was using.
>
>what was hitting for nps on the average?
>>
>>Pavel

StormX was usually getting around 3 Million NPS and during the Crafty Game it
hit 4.5 Million for some positions.

Sean



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.