Author: David Beauregard
Date: 11:48:23 11/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 05, 2000 at 09:51:57, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On November 05, 2000 at 00:52:34, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >>On November 03, 2000 at 10:39:36, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On November 03, 2000 at 00:18:40, David Beauregard wrote: >>> >>>>On November 02, 2000 at 22:28:50, pavel wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 02, 2000 at 15:07:48, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On November 02, 2000 at 05:07:36, Jerry wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Why waste your time with crafty or scrappy??? >>>>>>>Singacrafty is the same program and will play ALL other programs... >>>>>>>You can see craftys true rating there, not the over rated rank achieved by >>>>>>>noplaying those with better programs... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Good Luck on ICC...LeTiger is a tough opponent >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>You say I noplay those with better programs. I challenge you to prove >>>>>>that statement. >>>>>> >>>>>> attakinski cmslim criollo dini egghead FireViper >>>>>> GODMODE gzk inmortal Kurios Mr-Matt Pietari >>>>>> BarkingCow comp CUP98 EA6PZ eivissa Gatling >>>>>> Good-Boy HangerOn Jack-Daniels Masterchess muhaha >>>>>> twixer brut ComputerMan Dementia Eatman ET2000 >>>>>> Ghostn Gregorio HUGES jason-1 MasterMarc Mungo >>>>>> Wild5Crafy CARobot CraftyCrafty DesX Ebbi Eza >>>>>> GmSuperSoffer grouchy ibrax JJcool MateGoD MysticWarrior >>>>>> >>>>>>That is the _total_ noplay list for crafty at the present moment. You can >>>>>>verify this with an ICC admin if you want. >>>>>> >>>>>>Now exactly which "top programs" have I noplayed? Most of those are computer >>>>>>cheaters and crafty users. Only a very few are there for violating my finger >>>>>>notes. >>>>>> >>>>>>your turn. Maybe to offer facts rather than incorrect speculation? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>where is 'letiger' in your list? >>>>> >>>>>Pavel >>>> >>>>Bob, how about the following list of top programs you have no played including >>>>LeTiger who is still censored and noplayed. The following are top programs you >>>>have no played for what reason I do not know but here they are Mr. Hyatt. >>>> >>>>LeTiger, Good-Boy, CARobot, Gregorio, EA6PZ, Egghead, mystic warrior. These >>>>programs are top programs and can win and would win their fair share against >>>>Crafty if you would not hide behind your noplay and censor rules. >>>> >>>>LeTiger >>> >>> >>>OK... feel free to do what you want. That attitude does not earn my >>>admiration. I don't "hide behind" anything. I simply choose to noplay >>>folks that think they don't have to follow my rules. >>> >>>If you don't like my policies, all I can say is "tough". If you want to >>>say I hide behind my policies, fine. But don't come up with this nonsense >>>of hiding behind my noplay and censor list. I now remember why I censored >>>you in the first place. Hint: it has to do with "attitude". I don't feel >>>obligated to put up with nonsense. >>> >>>You have been un-noplayed for days. However, I don't care whether we play >>>again or not. There are _plenty_ of tiger operators on ICC that are a bit >>>less arrogant, and a lot more polite. I'll stick with them. >> >>What did he do? >> >>I know that I have had some trouble with operators and put them on my noplay >>list, but I can't remember why, in most cases. In a few cases I actually took >>notes, but now I can't find the notes. >> >>I've been running on Otter recently and I don't think that has much of a noplay >>list at all, so it has been playing some of the guys who are on your noplay >>list. >> >>So far, no problems. >> >>I don't know why you need to worry about these guys. If you want to get the >>games, but don't want the attitude, you can add something to your interface that >>deletes tells from them, as well as draw requests, requests for aborts, >>adjournments, kibitzes, and takebacks. That lets you censor them while still >>allowing them to play. At that point they become perfect opponents. > >The problem is that I don't want a huge number of games vs one single >program, which is where the 4 game limit came from. Prior to automatic >interfaces for commercial programs, it was rare to play 4 games in a row, >but once automatic interfaces were developed, it became common. He was >noplayed by my interface for playing well over 4 games in a row. Usually >when this happens, the operator will say "sorry, I missed your notes, it >won't happen again" and I remove them. In this case, I simply received more >abuse about "hiding" which hardly encourages me to remove anything at all. > > > > >> >>You have a whole bunch of people who want to fight with you simultaneously. I >>would find it hard to manage this many fights, personally. At some point it has >>to become impossible to manage. >> >>bruce > > >There is little to manage. Other than the occasional complaint here. Bob, I thought we had buried this issue. The problem came in that I did not play you four games in a row but that bounty hunter and other tigers, which I did not finger on, had already played the four games. I was the fifth game. Since going thru everybodies finger notes is a little tedious to see if they are playing tigers and now a lot of operators are playing multiple engines. I hope this puts to rest once and for all this issue and that LeTiger and Crafty can play once in a while. Thanks. David Beauregard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.