Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: ChessWire #57 Bushinsky quote

Author: Paulo Soares

Date: 12:46:04 11/06/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 06, 2000 at 01:55:10, Howard Exner wrote:

>On November 05, 2000 at 20:45:31, Paulo Soares wrote:
>
>>On November 05, 2000 at 15:55:16, Howard Exner wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Here is a cut and paste from ChessWire #57 (Kasparov Chess)
>>>
>>>Q: With the increasing power of computers, when do you think an unbeatable
>>>computer chess program will appear?
>>>
>>>A: Shay Bushinsky answers:
>>>The term unbeatable is a very tough word indeed. I cannot say that a computer
>>>will ever be unbeatable in any given game in the near future, but I do see a
>>>time - maybe in about three years from now, when a computer will always prevail
>>>in an eight game match against the strongest human.
>>>
>>>I always take special note when a chess computer authority discloses their
>>>projections on how chess computers will play in the future. Some follow up
>>>questions ...
>>>
>>>- What sort of hardware would this be?
>>>- Is the Junior team working on a massive multi-processor project?
>>>- "eight game match" is chosen. Would the "strongest human" do better in a
>>>longer match?
>>>- Are GM's that you know disclosing more information on how Junior and other
>>>strong programs are playing today? Not looking for exact names and quotes here
>>>as they might want to keep that discussion in private, just general
>>>observations.
>>
>>
>>I don't believe that a commercial program can win matchs of 8 games against
>>SGMs in three years.
>
>I feel the same way about a home pc beating the top player in the world in three
>years at standard 40/2.
>That's why I was curious for more details. I wondered if Shay was referring to a
>multi-processor machine or just an affordable home pc. Also I'm guessing that
>he and Amir are fortunate in having many GM associations. Perhaps they know
>something we don't?
>
>>I consider probable that the program wins the first match, but it will be
>>difficult to continue winning, because SGMs(or GMs) will already be knowing the
>>weaknesses of the program.
>>
>>Paulo


Although it seems madness, I believe that if Deeper Blue continued playing
matches against SGMs with certain frequency, they would also discover its
weaknesses.
The great challenge is not to build a group "computer+software" that wins
some matches, but a group that stays winning matches with a great frequency.
In my opinion, it is very difficult to believe that Shay and Amir get that
in 3 years.

Paulo



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.