Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 12:47:16 11/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 06, 2000 at 15:10:07, Peter Skinner wrote: >Yes, very true. Tiger 12.0 is number 3, but I bet Tiger 13.0 is #1. I don't >think anything will be able to touch it. > >Shredder 5.0 states it is 100 elo points higher than Fritz 6a, but that was in >"independant" testing. I could independantly test a problem, and state it is 500 >points better than another program. Doesn't make it so. There could be factors >that grossly miscontrude results. The Shredder 5.0 claim is just as valid as the claim/bet/estimation you make about Tiger 13.0, so there's little difference in accuracy. So it comes down to actual data, not biased estimations from either side. Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.