Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 13:09:04 11/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 06, 2000 at 15:47:16, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On November 06, 2000 at 15:10:07, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>Yes, very true. Tiger 12.0 is number 3, but I bet Tiger 13.0 is #1. I don't >>think anything will be able to touch it. >> >>Shredder 5.0 states it is 100 elo points higher than Fritz 6a, but that was in >>"independant" testing. I could independantly test a problem, and state it is 500 >>points better than another program. Doesn't make it so. There could be factors >>that grossly miscontrude results. > >The Shredder 5.0 claim is just as valid as the claim/bet/estimation you make >about Tiger 13.0, so there's little difference in accuracy. So it comes down to >actual data, not biased estimations from either side. > >Mogens. I truely am not biased. I have seen impressive results of Tiger II, and is definately stronger than Tiger 12.0 that captured #1 on the SSDF last year. I have some results already to back me, Shredder as to my knowledge has never been #1 on the SSDF, where Tiger has. Simply, Tiger II is stronger than Tiger I, I would expect the same result. There have been many fixes in Tiger II that make it even stronger. The hashing bug is fixed.. not longer limited there, and the book is incredible.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.