Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:34:02 11/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 06, 2000 at 16:09:04, Peter Skinner wrote: <snipped> >I truely am not biased. I have seen impressive results of Tiger II, and is >definately stronger than Tiger 12.0 that captured #1 on the SSDF last year. 1)I do not say that you are biased about tiger and I do not say that the testers of shredder5 are biased about shredder but we have no way to know. Saying that you are not biased is not more convincing than saying that the testers of shredder5 are independent. Both claims may be correct or wrong and the only way to know is when we get more data. 2)I believe that tiger13 is definately stronger than tiger12. It is almost always the case with new programs and I guess that the same is right for other programs. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.