Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:02:32 11/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 06, 2000 at 16:09:49, Jonathan Lee wrote: >From what I have seen "the history of computer chess", there has been quantum >leaps. In other cases, to evaluate chess positions that don't have an ending is >like the universe. How do you measure imprecise positions (on the chess board >or the universe)? >The common denominator among human versus machine at about 5 GHZ when the >machine loses is that both sides have their queens and lots of pawns. Of >course, there is the horizon effect, but put it very simply make the game >"complex". >Hardware quantum leaps are called Moore's Law. >Software quantum leaps in the 21st century, I don't know; software might come >from larger opening and endgame libraries. >Expect more hardware improvements than software improvements. >Jonathan (86th message) I disagree and I expect that software improvement will give 50% of the improvement. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.