Author: kurt
Date: 17:28:05 11/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 06, 2000 at 16:10:54, Peter Skinner wrote: >>It is obviously _very_ inferior. It only won the first CCT event, and >>finished in 2nd place in this one. Played _very_ badly is the only >>conclusion one can reach, right? > >Like I stated, a troll response. Crafty did well, and is hardly inferior. > >Idiots are like rocks, talk to them all you want, you will _never_ get an >intellegent answer back. > >Let's cool it! Yes,Crafty plays weak at times. >But,it is the fault of its book lines. >Becauce of its speed in depth search it must be >guided to maximize its strength. For example, >if its book puts it into a position where a plus >score changes to a minus score within its allowed >time frame it starts to play very erratic. >In my opinion the engine did its job. Not finding >a positive score or not loosing points in a particular >position is the fault of an ill prepared book line. >If craftys book gets upgraded to the equivelancy of >Shredder/Junior or Nimzo,I predict they will not win a game against crafty. >Lets rest it, regards,Kurt Widmann
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.