Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 19:24:38 11/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 06, 2000 at 17:21:55, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>On November 05, 2000 at 19:37:34, Netsurfer wrote:
>
>>Standings
>>Place Name Feder Rtg Loc Score M-Buch. Buch. Progr.
>>
>> 1 ShredderX, 1900 6.5 30.5 40.0 31.5
>> 2-5 NimzoX, 1800 5.5 30.0 39.5 25.0
>> Crafty, 2000 5.5 27.5 37.5 25.0
>> JuniorX, 1600 5.5 27.0 35.5 26.0
>> LambChop, 1300 5.5 26.5 35.0 22.0
>> 6 DiepX, 1400 5 27.5 37.0 25.0
>> 7-9 StormX, 900 4.5 29.0 39.0 19.5
>> ZChess, 100 4.5 24.0 33.5 21.0
>> InsomniacX, 1700 4.5 23.0 30.5 18.5
>>10-11 Yace, 200 4 23.5 29.0 18.5
>> Amateur, 1500 4 20.5 27.0 18.0
>>12-15 ArasanX, 700 3.5 27.0 36.0 18.5
>> Hossa, 1000 3.5 26.0 34.5 19.0
>> Sjeng, 400 3.5 22.5 27.5 14.5
>> TerraX, 300 3.5 19.0 24.5 11.5
>>16-18 Tinker, 1100 3 22.5 28.0 14.0
>> AvernoX, 800 3 22.0 27.5 11.0
>> ShrikeX, 1200 3 20.0 24.5 13.5
>> 19 Dorky, 600 2 22.5 28.0 8.0
>> 20 Mint, 500 0 20.0 26.0 0.0
>
>If Nimzo 8 is better than Fritz 6a according to Chess Base and Gambit Tiger 1.0
>won the famous Dutch Open, but here under {Storm X}Gambit Tiget 1.0 also scored
>much worse than the previous version of Shredder 4, therefore, Shredder 5 must
>be the best program which will be available soon.
>
>Pichard.
Gambit Tiger 1.0 did not participate in this tournament. Storm has nothing to do
with GT.
As for the comparison between Shredder and Gambit Tiger, some beta testers have
reported that Gambit Tiger 1.0 has significant positive scores against Shredder
4.
Match results and game scores have been posted here recently. Both Chess Tiger
13.0 and Gambit Tiger 1.0 win rather easily against Shredder 4.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.