Author: Harald Faber
Date: 01:13:37 11/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 07, 2000 at 00:56:49, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 07, 2000 at 00:43:01, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On November 06, 2000 at 17:01:38, john rice wrote: >> >>>This is the word i'm getting from icd info (+100elo over fritz6a). What do you >>>think? >>>Thanks in advance >> >>It might be stronger than Fritz6a, but certainly not 100 or more pts. But it is >>not the stronghest program available IMO, Tiger and Century are at least equal. >>(and much cheaper :-)) > >How do you know that it is not 100 elo better than fritz6a? I don't know. I just can't imagine. No program entered any competition 100pts above the leader. >I do not say that it is 100 elo better but I think that you cannot know the >truth about a program that you did not test. Correct. >We will have to wait and see if it is 100 elo better. >Uri Correct. But the info so far assumed extensive testing which led to a result of +100 over Fritz6a. I haven't seen any/enough games nor results that prove this assumption.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.