Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CCT-2 Final standings.

Author: Aaron Tay

Date: 01:41:22 11/07/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 06, 2000 at 12:44:36, Sean Empey wrote:

>On November 06, 2000 at 08:08:32, Lonnie Cook wrote:
>
>>On November 06, 2000 at 05:31:33, pavel wrote:
>>
>>>On November 06, 2000 at 05:28:58, Aaron Tay wrote:
>>>
>>>>On November 05, 2000 at 22:52:39, pavel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On November 05, 2000 at 20:04:03, Peter Skinner wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On November 05, 2000 at 19:37:34, Netsurfer wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Standings
>>>>>>>Place Name         Feder Rtg  Loc Score M-Buch. Buch. Progr.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  1   ShredderX,         1900     6.5      30.5  40.0   31.5
>>>>>>> 2-5  NimzoX,            1800     5.5      30.0  39.5   25.0
>>>>>>>      Crafty,            2000     5.5      27.5  37.5   25.0
>>>>>>>      JuniorX,           1600     5.5      27.0  35.5   26.0
>>>>>>>      LambChop,          1300     5.5      26.5  35.0   22.0
>>>>>>>  6   DiepX,             1400     5        27.5  37.0   25.0
>>>>>>> 7-9  StormX,            900      4.5      29.0  39.0   19.5
>>>>>>>      ZChess,            100      4.5      24.0  33.5   21.0
>>>>>>>      InsomniacX,        1700     4.5      23.0  30.5   18.5
>>>>>>>10-11 Yace,              200      4        23.5  29.0   18.5
>>>>>>>      Amateur,           1500     4        20.5  27.0   18.0
>>>>>>>12-15 ArasanX,           700      3.5      27.0  36.0   18.5
>>>>>>>      Hossa,             1000     3.5      26.0  34.5   19.0
>>>>>>>      Sjeng,             400      3.5      22.5  27.5   14.5
>>>>>>>      TerraX,            300      3.5      19.0  24.5   11.5
>>>>>>>16-18 Tinker,            1100     3        22.5  28.0   14.0
>>>>>>>      AvernoX,           800      3        22.0  27.5   11.0
>>>>>>>      ShrikeX,           1200     3        20.0  24.5   13.5
>>>>>>> 19   Dorky,             600      2        22.5  28.0    8.0
>>>>>>> 20   Mint,              500      0        20.0  26.0    0.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I think this was a very good result for Shredder. Equally, I am impressed with
>>>>>>Nimzox, Lambchop ( Wow, great result ), and Diepx.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I think if in the future that Diep has these type results, I may have to eat my
>>>>>>words about the program.
>>>>>
>>>>>yes, DIEP was impressive
>>>>>esp. the game against nimxox, where diep clearly saw the draw far ahead, and
>>>>>nimzo still showing 1.28 for itself.
>>>>>
>>>>>Nimzox had high 'nps' on a a 1000mhz machine, but I am still surprised that it
>>>>>turned second. As I wasn't much impressed by it's game.
>>>>>
>>>>>shredderx is the real hero, this guy is still using shredder4
>>>>>
>>>>>to me impressive was the result of zchess23 and lambchop.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Pavs ;)
>>>>
>>>>What about storm X?
>>>
>>>I dont know much about this program but it sure was runnign ona  nice cluster
>>>machine :)
>>>better than the one bob was using.
>>
>>what was hitting for nps on the average?
>>>
>>>Pavel
>
>StormX was usually getting around 3 Million NPS and during the Crafty Game it
>hit 4.5 Million for some positions.
>
>Sean

I see that it improved a lot since the last cct-1. Is it a improved version of
the publically available 0.6? But obviously the hardware helped a lot as well..



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.