Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:26:01 11/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 07, 2000 at 08:22:07, walter irvin wrote: >On November 07, 2000 at 05:27:39, Stefan Meyer-Kahlen wrote: > >>On November 07, 2000 at 03:34:11, Marcus Kaestner wrote: >> >>>On November 07, 2000 at 00:43:01, Harald Faber wrote: >>> >>>>On November 06, 2000 at 17:01:38, john rice wrote: >>>> >>>>>This is the word i'm getting from icd info (+100elo over fritz6a). What do you >>>>>think? >>>>>Thanks in advance >>>> >>>>It might be stronger than Fritz6a, but certainly not 100 or more pts. But it is >>>>not the stronghest program available IMO, Tiger and Century are at least equal. >>>>(and much cheaper :-)) >>> >>>he is strong, but far away to be the strongest. gambit tiger scores nearly 60% >>>against that shredder. >>> >>>marcus >> >>OK, I guess I have to make a FAQ for it: >> >>The last Shredder version Marcus Kästner got was Shredder 4.16 from June, but >>even this version is no longer running legally since about August because of a >>time bomb. >> >>So Marcus Kästner could have tested this version against other programs of that >>time. If I understood Christophe right there was no Gambit Tiger available at >>this time. >> >>Gambit Tiger and the new Rebel are problably very strong and I would like to see >>results of Shredder against this programs, but unforunately this is not yet >>possible for me or somebody else. >> >>If Tiger and/or Rebel are stronger that Shredder5 I certainly wouldn't be very >>happy but I could live with that, but right now there is nobody who can give us >>any hint concerning this. >> >>I don't thing that Tiger and/or Rebel need faked test results to proof their >>strength. >> >>Stefan (author of Shredder) > >no chess collection could possibly be complete without shredder.myself i plan on >getting both rebel and shredder .but i still wonder what your secret is ,what do >you know that keeps you winning championship after championship .are you just >better prepared vs other programs or is shredder that much stronger .if shredder >is that much stronger then it must be over 200 elo stronger or more to factor >out the chance factor .to me the chance factor is that the strongest program on >any given day may not win .but if one program is strong enough then luck is no >longer a factor .i mean if deep blue played compu-wimp there is 100% chance >deep blue will win. I disagree. I think that there are chances for other programs to beat deeper blue. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.