Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 07:58:54 11/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 07, 2000 at 08:39:31, Marcus Kaestner wrote: >>is that much stronger then it must be over 200 elo stronger or more to factor >>out the chance factor .to me the chance factor is that the strongest program on >>any given day may not win .but if one program is strong enough then luck is no > >the answer is very simple. he is not stronger playing many games. but he has the >more successful style to win a short tournament. I have been studying all available chess programs since 22 years and I do not agree with you. > >he is able to draw lost positions and scores 100% against weaker opponents. >that´s the key. Also the best human chess players do the same!! > >others like fritz or tiger are not coming into lost positions, but give away >half points against "weak" opponents. I do not agree. If Fritz 6 is no. 1 in the SSDF list it is mainly because it is scoring so well against weaker opponents. > >that´s the only difference. No I do not agree. > >best example: tiger > >as normal version he is on the long run slightly better than gambit tiger , but >was hardly able to win a tournament. Tiger is a very strong program, but I don't know the new version, so I do not say anything about it. Why don't you do the same with Shredder 5.0 which YOU DO NOT (I REPEAT) DO NOT KNOW? > >in the gambit version, with a more deadly style, he has immediately won two >tournaments out of two, even he is not equal strong to the normal version. This is only an opinion. Your opinion. > >understand? I hope you finally understand. It looks to me that you are upset with Stefan and that's the only reason why you speak so. > >marcus Sandro Necchi
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.