Author: Marcus Kaestner
Date: 08:30:23 11/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
>>the answer is very simple. he is not stronger playing many games. but he has the >>more successful style to win a short tournament. > >I have been studying all available chess programs since 22 years and I do not >agree with you. me also. so we have different opinions. so what is your explanation? the reason is, that shredder is 200 elo better? that´s the reason why he is successful in tournaments? or luck? did shredder have always luck? >> >>he is able to draw lost positions and scores 100% against weaker opponents. >>that´s the key. > >Also the best human chess players do the same!! and thats the reason why they win tournaments. so where is our disagreement? >> >>others like fritz or tiger are not coming into lost positions, but give away >>half points against "weak" opponents. > >I do not agree. If Fritz 6 is no. 1 in the SSDF list it is mainly because it is >scoring so well against weaker opponents. ahhh! and that is also the reason why fritz is missing every tournament victory because his draw-rate is so very high. that does not fit. >> >>as normal version he is on the long run slightly better than gambit tiger , but >>was hardly able to win a tournament. > >Tiger is a very strong program, but I don't know the new version, so I do not >say anything about it. Why don't you do the same with Shredder 5.0 which YOU DO >NOT (I REPEAT) DO NOT KNOW? hahaha, very funny. what do you know what i know and what not? are you sleeping under my bed? >> >>in the gambit version, with a more deadly style, he has immediately won two >>tournaments out of two, even he is not equal strong to the normal version. > >This is only an opinion. Your opinion. no, sir. this is not only my opinion. >> >>understand? > >I hope you finally understand. >It looks to me that you are upset with Stefan and that's the only reason why you >speak so. huh? what have i done? i gave the explanation why shredder is so successful in tournaments. what did i say against shredder? do you mean i should say: "shredder is successful intournaments because he is 200-300 elo above the rest!" do you really want me to publish such a nonsense? marcus
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.