Author: walter irvin
Date: 11:09:13 11/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 07, 2000 at 08:30:09, Marcus Kaestner wrote: >>>i see, you can count 2 and 2 together. >> >> >>You shouldn't be surprised. ;-) > >:-)) > >> >> >>>>well >>>>against Shredder but also to score better against other opponents. I am sure >>> >>>of course >>> >>>>GambitTiger does so as well. :-) >>> >>>you know he does... >> >> >>No, I don't know. I can only compare with Shredder4, not with Shredder5. > >i meant you know, that tiger does well also against others. > >> >> >>>>Do you have Shredder5 you are playing against GT or is this an old Beta? >>> >>>keep it in mind and compare it when both are on the market. >>>remember that there is a court-case and they have forbidden me (at the moment)to >>>talk about that. hoho, this is going to become a nice court-case :-))) >>> >>>marcus >> >> >>Sorry, I forgot that; when do you expect a decision? > >unfortunately the date is canceled a second time. i think end of november is the >earliest date for a decision. > >marcus i am amazed that there is a court case over a computer chess program .i mean i can understand if some one stole your program renamed it and was selling it as there program .but short of that i say it is very petty and notworthly of time .if a program is great it will be known if a program sucks it will be known .and if it is world champ it will be known .i can say CM is stronger than shredder or i can say sargon III beats shredder 25-0 ,no matter what i say shredder is still extremely strong world champ program.i think there should be a rule if you cant beat the program then you are not a strong enough player to evaluate it ha ha ha.but then no one would say anything.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.