Author: Sean Empey
Date: 11:28:31 11/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 07, 2000 at 04:41:22, Aaron Tay wrote: >On November 06, 2000 at 12:44:36, Sean Empey wrote: > >>On November 06, 2000 at 08:08:32, Lonnie Cook wrote: >> >>>On November 06, 2000 at 05:31:33, pavel wrote: >>> >>>>On November 06, 2000 at 05:28:58, Aaron Tay wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 05, 2000 at 22:52:39, pavel wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On November 05, 2000 at 20:04:03, Peter Skinner wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On November 05, 2000 at 19:37:34, Netsurfer wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Standings >>>>>>>>Place Name Feder Rtg Loc Score M-Buch. Buch. Progr. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1 ShredderX, 1900 6.5 30.5 40.0 31.5 >>>>>>>> 2-5 NimzoX, 1800 5.5 30.0 39.5 25.0 >>>>>>>> Crafty, 2000 5.5 27.5 37.5 25.0 >>>>>>>> JuniorX, 1600 5.5 27.0 35.5 26.0 >>>>>>>> LambChop, 1300 5.5 26.5 35.0 22.0 >>>>>>>> 6 DiepX, 1400 5 27.5 37.0 25.0 >>>>>>>> 7-9 StormX, 900 4.5 29.0 39.0 19.5 >>>>>>>> ZChess, 100 4.5 24.0 33.5 21.0 >>>>>>>> InsomniacX, 1700 4.5 23.0 30.5 18.5 >>>>>>>>10-11 Yace, 200 4 23.5 29.0 18.5 >>>>>>>> Amateur, 1500 4 20.5 27.0 18.0 >>>>>>>>12-15 ArasanX, 700 3.5 27.0 36.0 18.5 >>>>>>>> Hossa, 1000 3.5 26.0 34.5 19.0 >>>>>>>> Sjeng, 400 3.5 22.5 27.5 14.5 >>>>>>>> TerraX, 300 3.5 19.0 24.5 11.5 >>>>>>>>16-18 Tinker, 1100 3 22.5 28.0 14.0 >>>>>>>> AvernoX, 800 3 22.0 27.5 11.0 >>>>>>>> ShrikeX, 1200 3 20.0 24.5 13.5 >>>>>>>> 19 Dorky, 600 2 22.5 28.0 8.0 >>>>>>>> 20 Mint, 500 0 20.0 26.0 0.0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I think this was a very good result for Shredder. Equally, I am impressed with >>>>>>>Nimzox, Lambchop ( Wow, great result ), and Diepx. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I think if in the future that Diep has these type results, I may have to eat my >>>>>>>words about the program. >>>>>> >>>>>>yes, DIEP was impressive >>>>>>esp. the game against nimxox, where diep clearly saw the draw far ahead, and >>>>>>nimzo still showing 1.28 for itself. >>>>>> >>>>>>Nimzox had high 'nps' on a a 1000mhz machine, but I am still surprised that it >>>>>>turned second. As I wasn't much impressed by it's game. >>>>>> >>>>>>shredderx is the real hero, this guy is still using shredder4 >>>>>> >>>>>>to me impressive was the result of zchess23 and lambchop. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Pavs ;) >>>>> >>>>>What about storm X? >>>> >>>>I dont know much about this program but it sure was runnign ona nice cluster >>>>machine :) >>>>better than the one bob was using. >>> >>>what was hitting for nps on the average? >>>> >>>>Pavel >> >>StormX was usually getting around 3 Million NPS and during the Crafty Game it >>hit 4.5 Million for some positions. >> >>Sean > >I see that it improved a lot since the last cct-1. Is it a improved version of >the publically available 0.6? But obviously the hardware helped a lot as well.. The storm version that was used in the CCT2 is version StormSMP 1.0. It's not ready for public consumption yet. I still have to add Winboard support and some other modifications. Once that is complete I will release it to the public.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.