Author: Ernst Walet
Date: 13:07:55 11/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
Sorry, this is Tiger 13.0, not Gambit Tiger. The output of Gambit-Tiger is as follows. 00:00:00.0 -0,98 7 59764 Rfc1 Qxa2 Ra1 Qb2 Rab1 Qa3 00:00:00.7 -1,06 7 108532 Rfc1 Qa5 Rb2 Qc7 Qg3 Qf7 Rb8+ Rxb8 Qxb8+ Bf8 00:00:02.9 -0,92 8 342294 Rfc1 Raf8 Qe2 e5 dxe5 Bxe5 Nd7 Bxh2+ Kh1 R8f7 Kxh2 Rxd7 00:00:05.0 -1,08 9 792971 Rfc1 Qa5 Rb2 e5 Rd1 Rc8 a4 c3 Rb5 00:00:15.1 -1,04 10 2112327 Rfc1 Qa5 Rb2 e5 Rd1 Qc7 Rb5 Qc6 Ra5 Raf8 dxe5 Bxe5 Rxa7 00:00:39.6 -0,88 11 5551276 Rfc1 Qa5 Qe2 Rf7 Rxc4 Bxc4 Qxc4 Re8 Rb4 Qc7 Qe2 Ref8 Nxe6 00:01:18.1 -0,88 11 10970214 Rfc1 Qa5 Qe2 Rf7 Rxc4 Bxc4 Qxc4 Re8 Rb4 Qc7 Qe2 Ref8 Nxe6 Ernst. On November 07, 2000 at 15:59:50, Ernst Walet wrote: >Gambit-Tiger needs only 3 seconds to play Rfc1, and also sees Qa5 as the best >continuation, and not Qxa2. > >00:00:00.7 -0,38 7 54307 Qe2 Qa5 Rfc1 Qd8 Qg4 Qf6 >00:00:00.6 -0,54 7 82265 Qe2 Qa5 Rfc1 Qd8 Qg4 Qd6 Rb4 >00:00:02.8 -0,58 8 245198 Qe2 Qa5 Rfc1 Qc7 Rb4 Raf8 Rcb1 c3 >00:00:03.3 -0,50 8 447415 Rfc1 Qa5 Rb2 Raf8 Nd7 Qa3 Rbc2 R8f7 >00:00:07.2 -0,46 9 865600 Rfc1 Qa5 Rb2 Raf8 Nd7 Rd8 Nc5 Qc7 Rb4 >00:00:15.2 -0,52 10 1938300 Rfc1 Qa5 Rb2 Re8 a4 Qd8 Rb5 Ref8 Rcb1 c3 >00:00:36.5 -0,54 11 4701902 Rfc1 Qa5 Rb2 Rc8 a4 Qc7 Rc3 Rcf8 Rb5 Qd6 Ra5 >00:01:42.0 -0,58 12 13479136 Rfc1 Qa5 Rb2 e5 dxe5 Bxe5 Rd2 Rd8 Rcd1 Qc7 h3 Qc6 >Qe2 >00:04:34.9 -0,58 13 38149947 Rfc1 Qa5 Rb2 Rd8 Rd2 Qb5 a4 Qc6 Rb2 Qd6 Rcb1 e5 Bg5 >exd4 Bxd8 Qxc5 > > >Ernst.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.