Author: Hermano Ecuadoriano
Date: 14:36:00 11/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
Thanks. I think the smarter program, Tiger, should try to keep more pawns on the board. But I can see how its style would be especially difficult for humans: the structure keeps moving. The argument keeps changing... Tiger understands this principle, or method, of the continuous conversion of one advantage into another (as opposed to the older idea of the "consistent game"). So, Tiger plays according to what used to be called the "Soviet School", according to my understanding. I think Tiger plays like Bronstein played against Botvinnik.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.