Author: Paulo Soares
Date: 15:40:04 11/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 07, 2000 at 06:28:09, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 06, 2000 at 20:40:35, Paulo Soares wrote: > >>On November 06, 2000 at 19:24:26, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On November 06, 2000 at 16:56:10, Rajen Gupta wrote: >>> >>>>Folks, it looks like chessbase is, as usual, one step ahead of the competition >>>>by having available, not one but 2 multi processor engines-ie deep fritz and >>>>deep junior.With multi-processor versions of the DDR-Thunderbird just round the >>>>corner, for the ''the must have'' chess computer addicts this is a dream come >>>>true. No matter how strong shredder 5 or chesstiger3 or rebel 12(or is it >>>>13)are, they will not be able to match a dual processor deep fritz or deep >>>>junior, running on a dual thunderbird 1.2 Ghz with DD Ram! >>>> >>>>Truly this will become the ''Lexus'' of the chess world. >>>> >>>>rajen gupta >>> >>> >>>You can prepare either Deep Fritz or Deep Junior using 8 X 1.2 GHz with DD >>>Ram, and still neither of these Multi Processor engines will be able to >>>beat Kramnik, Kasparov or Anand in a match of 9 games at standard time control. >>>Yes, I did mentioned Kasparov, he is still the highest rated player in the >>>World, even if he did not managed to beat kramnik in a 16 games match. >>> >>>Pichard. >> >>Shay Bushinsky doesn't agree with you, he thinks that that should happen >>in 3 years. >> >>Paulo > >The 2 claims do not contradict. > >It is possible that Deep Junior or Deep Fritz will not win kasparov using >8*1.2GH but in 3 years we are going to have better software and better hardware. > >Uri You are right, I think that I confused the words either " and " neither ". I apologize to Jorge Pichard. Paulo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.