Author: walter irvin
Date: 16:51:46 11/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 07, 2000 at 18:59:57, michael mayfield wrote: >I remember reading somewhere that deep blue's software wasn't very strong >compared to programs like fritz and that it was the hardware speed that was the >main factor to account for its strength....Anyone have an info about this? > > >thanks.. people always like to say that deep blue had a great eval and so far better than any pc program . the reality is that if you could run hiarcs at 200,000,000 nps it would be rated 3000+ elo .its 90% hardware 10% software .i mean if you could run sargon III at 200,000,000 it would be a super grandmaster .i think also what helped deep blue was the program was not available for kasparov to practice against .
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.