Author: Lonnie Cook
Date: 17:41:20 11/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 07, 2000 at 19:51:46, walter irvin wrote: >On November 07, 2000 at 18:59:57, michael mayfield wrote: > >>I remember reading somewhere that deep blue's software wasn't very strong >>compared to programs like fritz and that it was the hardware speed that was the >>main factor to account for its strength....Anyone have an info about this? >> >> >>thanks.. >people always like to say that deep blue had a great eval and so far better than >any pc program . the reality is that if you could run hiarcs at 200,000,000 nps >it would be rated 3000+ elo .its 90% hardware 10% software .i mean if you could >run sargon III at 200,000,000 it would be a super grandmaster .i think also what >helped deep blue was the program was not available for kasparov to practice >against . Well I agree with most of your concept but software does matter and if u have some solid strong software and outta this world iron u can be plowing down opponent after opponent. Actually I think if u had Shredder on some serious Iron it would be immensely powerful, same as Fritz6,Rebel,CT,Junior 6 Gandalf etc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.