Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 01:04:30 11/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 07, 2000 at 19:22:10, Marcus Kaestner wrote: >hi again, > >>>don´t care about that. i´m also involved. but that does not prevent me from >>>saying what i think and what i know. >> >>I agree with you. > >good! The only difference is that I believe it is very IMPORTANT how to say things. I mean that the same thing said in a different way may gets a different reply. > >>>>Of course, you are free to believe it or not. >>> >>>didn´t you realize that a made the same statement about a month ago? >>>at that time people named me a dreamer and a liar and i´m not able to know, and >>>so on.... >> >>Yes, I know and I did not made any comment on your comments. > >of course i believe in your results. >i have not a single reason not to believe. Good. > >>> >>>the same as these days. >>> >>>i was right at that time, and i´m right these days. >> >>I hope you are not right when you say that Chess Tiger is strong, but if it >>happens we can only start thinking how we can do better. > >that is the very exciting competition these days... Yes. > >>Well, I think that the new Shredder 5.0, running on a 1 GHz Athlon Thunderbird, >>like my computers, should be 2700 Elo points strong against human players at >>tournament time controls. I think this is a real achivement. >>Do you agree? > >i have no clear idea in this area. >2700 sounds VERY high for my ears. on the other hand: junior, fritz and >p.conners have proven to score in this region. so at the end i should throw away >my scepsis and agree to you. Well, this is my and my cooperators' impression, because there are no enough data to say that this is sure 100% > >>> >>>yes, the new shredder was and is about 100 elo stronger than the last generation >>>of chess-engines. here we are in full agreement. but shredder is not stronger >>>than the new generation of chess engines. the others (especially christophe >>>theron) have made the same jump and some even a higher one. Well, we'll see. >> >>Well, I hope you are wrong in this case, but I have no data to tell my opinion >>about this. > >don´t care too much about that. i think the top 3 are very close. even if >shredder has problems with gambit tiger, he will score better against another >opponent. > >>>hahahaha, then you should IMMEDIATELY swap to the chessbits site and download >>>the video of the most beautiful sicilian woman i´ve ever seen: >>> >>>http://mitglied.tripod.de/ChessBits/index.html >> >>Thanks a lot! > >give me a sign if you like her or not ;-) >(you also can see her on ed´s site) Sorry I could not find it, maybe because of my poor German. I'll go on Ed's site than. > >>>i have no problems with different opinions and i like all computerchess-lovers, >>>because we all are freaks. >> >>I do too. >> >>> >>>be sure, that i´m not a nasty guy. >> >>I believe you. > >thank you :-))))) My only friendly suggestion to you is to think about what you say and say it in a way that will not hurt anybody. This is a general statement and not referred to anything specifically. It looks to me that you a little to direct when you say what you think about something. It is not a critic. I "speak well", but sometime I make the same mistake, so I am not trying to teach something, only a friendly suggestion. > >> >>> >>>the only thing i hate are lies about my person or about other things. >> >>I do the same, so we can be friends. > >very nice to hear. >a problem between stefan and me should not be a problem between you and me. I think that talking to each other would have avoid this, but it is only an impression. I hope that you can clearify the matter. We should enjoy all these new programs and not fight to each other... > >maybe i can visit you on my text italian trip. Well, you are welcome to Bella Italia. > >good night >marcus Have a nice day. Sandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.