Author: Marcus Kaestner
Date: 02:12:10 11/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
>>yes, the new shredder was and is about 100 elo stronger than the last generation >>of chess-engines. here we are in full agreement. but shredder is not stronger >>than the new generation of chess engines. the others (especially christophe >>theron) have made the same jump and some even a higher one. > >I hope that you are right about tiger but unfortunately the rebel site does not >agree with you. > >see http://www.rebel.nl/r11.htm > >If you go down at this site to 9.10 you can see that the jump in tiger is >estimated as only 50-70 elo so they do not think that tiger made the same jump. as you said: they estimate. i talk about my own results. > >Other results that I saw suggest that at least at shorter time control tiger is >at the same level of fritz6a or slightly better but not 100 elo better. yes, that is right. but there is a big difference to tiger 12. tiger 12 is a very good blitzer, but makes no progress (in comparison) at longer time controls. the new version has another search and now tiger gets stronger and stronger (in comparison) with more time. in my own tests tiger is about 60 elo above fritz6. based on cel500 and 30m blitz. on 3h a game on cel 566 the difference becomes bigger. btw: the games on the rebel-site are based on 40/40 on a slower machine (i think) >I like christophe but I have to support the truth. same with me. marcus
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.