Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Kuhn - relevence to computer chess -

Author: Joe Besogn

Date: 09:00:47 11/08/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 08, 2000 at 11:36:10, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On November 08, 2000 at 11:23:04, Mogens Larsen wrote:
>
>>On November 08, 2000 at 11:02:54, Joe Besogn wrote:
>>
>>Chris,
>
>Good eyes.  Glad to see you are alert and picked up on the "ID".
>
>I particularly like it when he talks about himself in the third person,
>and pats himself on the back.  I still get a chuckle out of these
>conversations where there appear to be "many" but in reality there are just
>a "few".
>
>:)
>
>(hint:  look for other posts by him  - same handle )
>
>I was going to suggest that he and Thorsten communicate via email or phone,
>since they were having what was essentially a private conversation in another
>thread.  I thought better of it, but since you bring it up.  :)
>
>

Please get your facts straight before posting. Look at the thread headers below:

six replies from Fernando
one reply from Thorsten Czub
one reply from Christophe Theron

also replying to other posters
one from Christophe Theron
one from Johnathon Lee
one from Uri Blass

Where is the 'private conversation between 'he' and Thorsten?

Your 'many' and 'few' smear implies that I'm talking to myself somewhere. Which
of Christophe, Thorsten, Fernando, Johnathon or Uri am I impersonating?

This account is on-topic, non-abusive and restricts itself to topics of computer
chess development and difficulties faced by participants therein.

Thank you.



Re: To all those discussing 'new paradigm' - Fernando Villegas 10:41:01
11/06/2000 (2)
How much radical a new way of thought has to be to be a paradigm? - Joe Besogn
09:33:56 11/07/2000 (1)
Re: How much radical a new way of thought has to be to be a paradigm? -
Christophe Theron 00:41:05 11/08/2000 (1)
Re: How much radical a new way of thought has to be to be a paradigm? - Joe
Besogn 07:15:59 11/08/2000 (0)
Re: To all those discussing 'new paradigm' - Joe Besogn 10:52:19 11/06/2000 (1)
Re: To all those discussing 'new paradigm' - Fernando Villegas 11:32:01
11/06/2000 (1)
Re: To all those discussing 'new paradigm' - Joe Besogn 15:24:04 11/06/2000 (1)
Re: To all those discussing 'new paradigm' - Fernando Villegas 15:32:02
11/06/2000 (2)
Re: To all those discussing 'new paradigm' - Joe Besogn 06:44:19 11/07/2000 (1)
Re: To all those discussing 'new paradigm' - Fernando Villegas 08:40:09
11/07/2000 (1)
Re: To all those discussing 'new paradigm' - Joe Besogn 10:08:56 11/07/2000 (1)
Re: To all those discussing 'new paradigm' - Fernando Villegas 11:40:39
11/07/2000 (2)
Re: To all those discussing 'new paradigm' - Joe Besogn 07:32:19 11/08/2000 (0)
Re: To all those discussing 'new paradigm' - Christophe Theron 01:07:57
11/08/2000 (1)
Good example of paradigm shift thinking - Joe Besogn 06:28:54 11/08/2000 (1)
Re: Good example of paradigm shift thinking - Thorsten Czub 07:39:24 11/08/2000
(1)
Re: Good example of paradigm shift thinking - Joe Besogn 09:28:14 11/08/2000 (1)
Re: Good example of paradigm shift thinking - Fernando Villegas 11:35:19
11/08/2000 (0)
The chess board has semi-precise 64 squares; the universe is different -
Jonathan Lee 16:09:49 11/06/2000 (1)
Re: The chess board has semi-precise 64 squares; the universe is different - Uri
Blass 17:02:32 11/06/2000 (0)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.