Author: José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba
Date: 10:16:08 11/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2000 at 10:43:13, pavel wrote: >On November 08, 2000 at 07:59:09, walter irvin wrote: > >>shredder 5 is not the best program , that would be deep shredder,followed by >>deep junior.a multi proccessor program is going to be the best.i would like to >>see a deep gamit .it must be very hard to make a program smp because not very >>many programs do it . > >as shanti has put it "dont start it again" >I have to say the same. > >your assumption, pressumption, guesswork, opinion or whatever is baseless > >unless you actually owned those program tested it, played 1000s of games (as >jouni would put it). > >you cant tell for sure. > >so lets not start fighting on something that we dont know about... > >just my quater.. > >pavs. > >ps, "shanti" means "peace" in India. It seems you are missing Walter's point. He is simply stating that Deep Shredder will be stronger than Shredder (I assume he means when using a multi-cpu machine). That is almost obvious, without the need of playing any game: more cpus implies more raw search speed, which in turn implies deeper searches and consequently stronger play.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.