Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 10:28:05 11/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2000 at 12:00:47, Joe Besogn wrote: >On November 08, 2000 at 11:36:10, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On November 08, 2000 at 11:23:04, Mogens Larsen wrote: >> >>>On November 08, 2000 at 11:02:54, Joe Besogn wrote: >>> >>>Chris, >> >>Good eyes. Glad to see you are alert and picked up on the "ID". >> >>I particularly like it when he talks about himself in the third person, >>and pats himself on the back. I still get a chuckle out of these >>conversations where there appear to be "many" but in reality there are just >>a "few". >> >>:) >> >>(hint: look for other posts by him - same handle ) >> >>I was going to suggest that he and Thorsten communicate via email or phone, >>since they were having what was essentially a private conversation in another >>thread. I thought better of it, but since you bring it up. :) >> >> > >Please get your facts straight before posting. Look at the thread headers below: > >six replies from Fernando >one reply from Thorsten Czub >one reply from Christophe Theron > >also replying to other posters >one from Christophe Theron >one from Johnathon Lee >one from Uri Blass > >Where is the 'private conversation between 'he' and Thorsten? > >Your 'many' and 'few' smear implies that I'm talking to myself somewhere. Which >of Christophe, Thorsten, Fernando, Johnathon or Uri am I impersonating? None of the above. I am sure you can figure out the rest. BTW it happened in a thread that shows up near the _bottom_ of CCC, not in this one. But the same "pseudonym" appears there... > >This account is on-topic, non-abusive and restricts itself to topics of computer >chess development and difficulties faced by participants therein. > >Thank you. > > > >Re: To all those discussing 'new paradigm' - Fernando Villegas 10:41:01 >11/06/2000 (2) >How much radical a new way of thought has to be to be a paradigm? - Joe Besogn >09:33:56 11/07/2000 (1) >Re: How much radical a new way of thought has to be to be a paradigm? - >Christophe Theron 00:41:05 11/08/2000 (1) >Re: How much radical a new way of thought has to be to be a paradigm? - Joe >Besogn 07:15:59 11/08/2000 (0) >Re: To all those discussing 'new paradigm' - Joe Besogn 10:52:19 11/06/2000 (1) >Re: To all those discussing 'new paradigm' - Fernando Villegas 11:32:01 >11/06/2000 (1) >Re: To all those discussing 'new paradigm' - Joe Besogn 15:24:04 11/06/2000 (1) >Re: To all those discussing 'new paradigm' - Fernando Villegas 15:32:02 >11/06/2000 (2) >Re: To all those discussing 'new paradigm' - Joe Besogn 06:44:19 11/07/2000 (1) >Re: To all those discussing 'new paradigm' - Fernando Villegas 08:40:09 >11/07/2000 (1) >Re: To all those discussing 'new paradigm' - Joe Besogn 10:08:56 11/07/2000 (1) >Re: To all those discussing 'new paradigm' - Fernando Villegas 11:40:39 >11/07/2000 (2) >Re: To all those discussing 'new paradigm' - Joe Besogn 07:32:19 11/08/2000 (0) >Re: To all those discussing 'new paradigm' - Christophe Theron 01:07:57 >11/08/2000 (1) >Good example of paradigm shift thinking - Joe Besogn 06:28:54 11/08/2000 (1) >Re: Good example of paradigm shift thinking - Thorsten Czub 07:39:24 11/08/2000 >(1) >Re: Good example of paradigm shift thinking - Joe Besogn 09:28:14 11/08/2000 (1) >Re: Good example of paradigm shift thinking - Fernando Villegas 11:35:19 >11/08/2000 (0) >The chess board has semi-precise 64 squares; the universe is different - >Jonathan Lee 16:09:49 11/06/2000 (1) >Re: The chess board has semi-precise 64 squares; the universe is different - Uri >Blass 17:02:32 11/06/2000 (0)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.