Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Kuhn - relevence to computer chess -

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 11:48:18 11/08/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 08, 2000 at 13:33:11, Joe Besogn wrote:

>
>I can't figure out the rest at all. What do you mean?
>
>I presume you're trying some kind of diversionary smear, but which thread are
>you refering to?

There is no "smear" unless you consider being called "Chris Whittington" a
smear.  A smear is usually the word that describes the action where someone
tells something about someone that is not only not true, but it is 'bad' as
well.  I didn't do _either_.

And yes, I am talking about the thread near the bottom about the "new paradigm"



>
>Can you explain your smear?


<     >

that is the explanation since there was no "smear".   (the explanation is
between the angle brackets above).  I notice that nowhere do you dispute that
neither I nor Mogens are wrong about your real ID.

Please read all of my responses to you today.  One has a genuine request for
you to return under your real name.


>
>Thank you.
>
>
>


Ditto...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.