Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Kuhn - relevence to computer chess -

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 11:50:08 11/08/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 08, 2000 at 14:09:30, Joe Besogn wrote:

>On November 08, 2000 at 13:32:04, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On November 08, 2000 at 11:57:13, Mogens Larsen wrote:
>>
>>>On November 08, 2000 at 11:36:10, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>
>>>>Good eyes.  Glad to see you are alert and picked up on the "ID".
>>>
>>>Thank you. I've known for a while, but an attempt to repeat the previous
>>>irrelevant thread deserved a reply, however limited.
>>>
>>>>I particularly like it when he talks about himself in the third person,
>>>>and pats himself on the back.  I still get a chuckle out of these
>>>>conversations where there appear to be "many" but in reality there are just
>>>>a "few".
>>>
>>>Maybe we should all do that. It could be the start of a new paradigm to benefit
>>>us all. Noone have to feel alone or feel that their views are unwanted. Be your
>>>own most avid supporter.
>>
>>That is yet another "new paradigm" that Chris can have credit for.  :)  A
>>group discussion between alter-egos of one participant.  I suppose the
>>ultimate would be where each member has his own message board, where he can
>>talk and argue with himself without being distracted by others?  :)
>>
>
>Another smear. You make 'peace' offerings in one thread and smears in another.
>
>Since I'm not aware of conducting conversations with myself, where is this
>alleged thread that I may check?


In this case, you are talking with Thorsten, about yourself, as though you are
a third party.  My wording may have been poor...  as here you didn't talk to
yourself.  But you definitely have in the past.

It isn't a 'smear' at all, and my 'peace offering' was quite sincere, and still
stands...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.