Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:00:06 11/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2000 at 15:14:25, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On November 08, 2000 at 09:28:14, Joe Besogn wrote: >bob said or avoked the impression that gambit-tiger is dump. >and can only attack. I did not understand it from bob's words. I remember that he said that Rebel tiger13 is clearly better than the previous version in endgames and Gambittiger is identical to Rebeltiger in the endgame. <snipped> >>If they looked at CSTal, if they listened, they'ld have seen that ALL moves at >>the root were scored, scores broken into components, all to two places of >>decimals. The entire evaluation algorithm was there for all to see. Only they >>didn't look. It was there for five years, only they didn't look. > >why should they. as bob said: he knows anything about everything in >computerchess. You are distorting bob's words. He did not say that he knows anything about everything in computerchess. I also do not agree that they could see all by looking at Cstal. The source code of cstal is not free and even if programmers see that their program is losing against cstal it is not easy to learn the correct thing to stop it without causing other problems of losing by wrong sacrifices. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.