Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: shredder 5 not the best

Author: Marcus Kaestner

Date: 14:34:00 11/08/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 08, 2000 at 07:59:09, walter irvin wrote:

>shredder 5 is not the best program , that would be deep shredder,followed by
>deep junior.a multi proccessor program is going to be the best.

not at all.
in the chessbits-tournament rating list is deep junior (though on double-fast
hardware) not the first. see:

shredder x 2717 (40 games)
century 3 beta 2656 (26 games)
tiger 11.9 2624 (12 games)
shredder 4s(chessbits-style) 2620 (28 games)
deep junior 6 2616 (130 games)
tiger 12 (new style) 2612 (31 games)
fritz 6 2600 (231 games)
tiger 12 2582 (120 games)
shredder 4 2581 (221 games)

even there are not enough games for some programs you can see, that deep junior
hardly is the best.

but i admit, that a dual-shredder 5 would have the best chances to become number
1.

marcus



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.