Author: Chuck
Date: 17:26:37 11/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 07, 2000 at 22:12:59, Chuck wrote: >On November 07, 2000 at 17:40:08, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On November 07, 2000 at 16:26:24, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On November 07, 2000 at 09:03:24, Mogens Larsen wrote: >>> >>>>On November 07, 2000 at 07:48:19, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>>[D]3rr1k1/1bq1b1p1/pp1ppnnp/2p5/2P1P3/1PNBBN1P/P2Q1PP1/R2R2K1 w - - 0 1 >> >>>LG2000 wants to play 3.e5 and not 3.Ng5 of gandalf. >> >>Yes, but it still plays Bxh6, which was the main exercise on my part. >> >>The move is also selected by Comet (at least for the moment): >> >>1.Bxh6 gxh6 2.Qxh6 Nf8 3.e5 N6h7 4.Bxh7+ Nxh7 5.Qxe6+ Kh8 6.Nd5 Bxd5 7.Rxd5 dxe5 >>8.Rxd8 Rxd8 9.Nxe5 >> ± (0.86) Depth: 12/35 00:05:06 77909kN >> >>What move does Hiarcs select? >> > >I am running this position on Hiarcs right now and at ply 10, 11 and 12 Hiarcs >7.32 has selected Bxh6. I will post full results when he gets deeper. Hiarcs has picked Bxh6 through ply 14 (2/41), but the score has dropped to +0.02. This search has taken 22+ hours so far on an Athlon 700. > >Here's the analysis: >New position >3rr1k1/1bq1b1p1/pp1ppnnp/2p5/2P1P3/1PNBBN1P/P2Q1PP1/R2R2K1 w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Hiarcs 7.32: > >= (-0.02) 1.Rac1 00:00:00 >= (0.04) 1.Rac1 Bc6 00:00:00 >= (-0.05) 1.Rac1 Bc6 2.a3 00:00:00 >= (0.03) 1.Qb2 Bc6 2.b4 00:00:00 >= (-0.07) 1.Qb2 Bc6 2.a3 Qb7 3.Qc2 00:00:00 >= (-0.05) 1.Rac1 Bc6 2.a3 Qb7 3.Qc2 00:00:00 >= (-0.05) 1.Rac1 Bc6 2.a3 Qb7 3.Qc2 00:00:00 >= (-0.02) 1.Nh2 Bc6 2.f4 Qb7 3.Qc2 00:00:02 >= (-0.12) 1.Nh2 Ne5 2.Bf4 Nxd3 3.Qxd3 Nh5 4.Ne2 00:00:04 >= (-0.07) 1.Rac1 Nd7 2.a3 00:00:04 >= (-0.01) 1.a3 Nd7 2.b4 Nge5 3.Nxe5 Nxe5 00:00:05 >= (-0.07) 1.a3 Nd7 00:00:05 >= (0.24) 1.Bxh6 Nd7 00:00:08 >² (0.32) 1.Bxh6 gxh6 2.Qxh6 Ne5 3.Nxe5 00:00:09 >= (0.07) 1.Bxh6 gxh6 00:00:11 >= (-0.17) 1.Bxh6 gxh6 2.Qxh6 Nf8 3.Ng5 e5 00:00:14 >= (-0.08) 1.a3 Nd7 2.Nh2 Nde5 3.f4 Nxd3 4.Qxd3 Bh4 5.Nf1 00:00:16 >= (0.04) 1.a3 Nd7 2.Nh2 Nde5 3.Bc2 Bf6 00:00:50 >= (-0.04) 1.a3 Nd7 2.Nh2 Nde5 3.Bc2 Bf6 4.f4 Nf7 5.Ng4 Bh4 00:01:13 >= (0.16) 1.Bxh6 gxh6 2.Qxh6 Nf8 3.e5 N6h7 4.Bxh7+ Nxh7 5.Qxe6+ Kh8 6.Nd5 Bxd5 >7.Qxd5 dxe5 8.Qxe5+ Qxe5 9.Nxe5 Rxd1+ 10.Rxd1 Bg5 11.Nf7+ Kg8 12.Nxg5 Nxg5 >00:01:49 >= (0.14) 1.Bxh6 gxh6 2.Qxh6 Nf8 3.e5 N6h7 4.Bxh7+ Nxh7 5.Qxe6+ Kh8 6.Nd5 Bxd5 >7.Qxd5 dxe5 8.Qxe5+ Qxe5 9.Nxe5 Kg8 10.Nc6 Rxd1+ 11.Rxd1 Bh4 12.g3 00:04:54 >= (0.09) 1.Bxh6 gxh6 2.Qxh6 Nf8 3.e5 N6h7 4.Bxh7+ Nxh7 5.Qxe6+ Kh8 6.Nd5 Bxd5 >7.Qxd5 dxe5 8.Qxe5+ Qxe5 9.Nxe5 Kg8 10.Nd7 b5 11.Rd5 bxc4 12.bxc4 Rc8 00:18:51 > >(K7-700, Columbia 07.11.2000) > > >>>I see that gandlf after more than 10.5 hours at depth 15 has also 3.e5 in the >>>main line and the score dropped to 0.25 pawns for white so it started to >>>understand that 1.Bxh6 is not so good. >> >>What would be the best move? Bc2? >> >>>It got this main line after 5 hours 24 minutes abd 1 second. >>> >>>Gandalf expects 1.Bxh6 gxh6 2.Qxh6 Nf8 3.e5 N6h7 4.Kh1 Kh8 5.Be4 dxe5. >>> >>>4.Kh1 is strange in this line because 4.Bxh7+ wins a pawn but gandalf does not >>>want to trade the bishop for some reason. >> >>Maybe there's a penalty for exchanging pieces when the opponent king is exposed >>(?). >> >>Mogens. >> >>PS: I see that Denmark and Israel drew at the Olympics in Turkey. The game on >>the 2nd board seemed very strange when I watched some of it live. It looked like >>a win for Avrukh.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.