Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 18:26:24 11/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2000 at 21:08:18, Bruce Moreland wrote: >But that doesn't >warrant the term "revolutionary", however good it would look in advertising >copy. This is an evolution, it's something for others to experiment with, and >nobody will have to rewrite their program to do it. > >bruce A:"it's evolution !" B:"No - it's revolution !" A:"no ! you are wrong." B:"no - YOU are wrong !" A:"i tell you - it's normal evololution, just increasing some statical values." B:"NONONO. you don't understand. it's more than this!" ok - we will stand this without offending anyone. ok ... we try. we try. no insults. come on. come on. lets concentrate on the game... no prejudices. come one. ok .- got it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.