Author: pavel
Date: 20:39:25 11/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2000 at 17:34:00, Marcus Kaestner wrote: >On November 08, 2000 at 07:59:09, walter irvin wrote: > >>shredder 5 is not the best program , that would be deep shredder,followed by >>deep junior.a multi proccessor program is going to be the best. > >not at all. >in the chessbits-tournament rating list is deep junior (though on double-fast >hardware) not the first. see: > >shredder x 2717 (40 games) >century 3 beta 2656 (26 games) >tiger 11.9 2624 (12 games) >shredder 4s(chessbits-style) 2620 (28 games) >deep junior 6 2616 (130 games) >tiger 12 (new style) 2612 (31 games) >fritz 6 2600 (231 games) >tiger 12 2582 (120 games) >shredder 4 2581 (221 games) > >even there are not enough games for some programs you can see, that deep junior >hardly is the best. > >but i admit, that a dual-shredder 5 would have the best chances to become number >1. > >marcus I dont get this. In your earlier posts you said something like "shredder5 is far from being the best", this is based on the fact, according to you, that you have shredder5. but, in your tests shredder5 clearly seems to be more than 100elo better than fritz6, and well ahead of others. (that is if you believe your test results). i am kinda confused, do you mind clearing it up? thanks pavs.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.