Author: Uri Blass
Date: 21:56:15 11/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2000 at 23:39:25, pavel wrote: >On November 08, 2000 at 17:34:00, Marcus Kaestner wrote: > >>On November 08, 2000 at 07:59:09, walter irvin wrote: >> >>>shredder 5 is not the best program , that would be deep shredder,followed by >>>deep junior.a multi proccessor program is going to be the best. >> >>not at all. >>in the chessbits-tournament rating list is deep junior (though on double-fast >>hardware) not the first. see: >> >>shredder x 2717 (40 games) >>century 3 beta 2656 (26 games) >>tiger 11.9 2624 (12 games) >>shredder 4s(chessbits-style) 2620 (28 games) >>deep junior 6 2616 (130 games) >>tiger 12 (new style) 2612 (31 games) >>fritz 6 2600 (231 games) >>tiger 12 2582 (120 games) >>shredder 4 2581 (221 games) >> >>even there are not enough games for some programs you can see, that deep junior >>hardly is the best. >> >>but i admit, that a dual-shredder 5 would have the best chances to become number >>1. >> >>marcus > > I dont get this. > >In your earlier posts you said something like "shredder5 is far from being the >best", >this is based on the fact, according to you, that you have shredder5. >but, in your tests shredder5 clearly seems to be more than 100elo better than >fritz6, and well ahead of others. (that is if you believe your test results). > >i am kinda confused, do you mind clearing it up? > >thanks >pavs. It is very clear. Tiger13 and gambittiger are not in this list and Marcus claimed that they are not worse than shredder5. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.