Author: walter irvin
Date: 04:42:30 11/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2000 at 17:34:00, Marcus Kaestner wrote: >On November 08, 2000 at 07:59:09, walter irvin wrote: > >>shredder 5 is not the best program , that would be deep shredder,followed by >>deep junior.a multi proccessor program is going to be the best. > >not at all. >in the chessbits-tournament rating list is deep junior (though on double-fast >hardware) not the first. see: > >shredder x 2717 (40 games) >century 3 beta 2656 (26 games) >tiger 11.9 2624 (12 games) >shredder 4s(chessbits-style) 2620 (28 games) >deep junior 6 2616 (130 games) >tiger 12 (new style) 2612 (31 games) >fritz 6 2600 (231 games) >tiger 12 2582 (120 games) >shredder 4 2581 (221 games) > >even there are not enough games for some programs you can see, that deep junior >hardly is the best. > >but i admit, that a dual-shredder 5 would have the best chances to become number >1. > >marcus that is amazing junior is a strong program at slow time controls.what happened?????????
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.