Author: José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba
Date: 09:02:01 11/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2000 at 21:24:48, Christophe Theron wrote: > >If those previous versions were that superior, why don't we see them on top of >the SSDF list for example? Shredder 4 is currently number 4. > Play in SSDF consists of long autoplayed matches, which are different from tournament play. I believe top programs are very close in strenght to each other. > >What is the difference between tournaments and privately played games? > Direct author involvment, to the point of taking full responsibility for ANY operating mistakes. > >Do you >think the SSDF games are privately played? > Yes, SSDF is a big collective private tester. Nothing wrong with that, of course, I think they do a good job and encourage them and all the other private testers to continue their work (and share their results) as long as they derive fun from it. > >I am very careful with what I say about my program. For example, I would never >let somebody tell it is 100 elo points above Fritz6 without reacting... > That is your choice and I fully respect it. > > Christophe José.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.