Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: shredder 5 not the best

Author: Enrique Irazoqui

Date: 09:06:43 11/09/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 09, 2000 at 11:02:30, Marcus Kaestner wrote:

>btw: if you say, shredder 4.22 and f6a and new tiger are nearly equal (on which
>control?)

London time controls.

> then you say shredder 5 is not the best,

I'm not saying that. First, I didn't have Sandro's book. Second, if it is true,
as I think, that differences between F6a/b, S4.22, Tiger 13 and Gambit are to
close to call (CNN language about Gore-Bush), then S4.22 is on top together with
the others, maybe as primus inter pares, maybe not.

> because the version 4.22 is
>nearly identical with the version 4.24 which played in london, and this
>london-engine is the engine which will come to the market.

I heard something to this effect, but I don't know for a fact that Shredder 5
will be "nearly identical" to S4.22.

>and before somebody yells again:
>the actual version is shredder 4.34 or 4.35. but all changes since 4.24 are only
>gui-changes.

Maybe, but it is up to Stefan to confirm it. I simply don't know for sure.

Enrique

>marcus



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.