Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 09:08:58 11/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 09, 2000 at 10:57:38, Marcus Kaestner wrote: >>After what I have seen in my own games and testing, Fritz 6a/b, Shredder 4.22, >>Tiger 13.0 and Gambit 1.0 are roughly equal in strength, say +- 20 points at > >if you have these results, than i´m right that shredder 5 is far away from >beeing the best. to be the best indicates to be better by minimum 30 elo than >all others. > >>slow time controls. Any claims about a new program being 100 points stronger >>than F6a/b, which in some cases means 170 over the prior version of the same >>program, doesn't deserve any credibility. > >stop! i claimed better than fritz 6, not 6a or 6b! I see. Well, there is a big difference in strenth between F6 and F6a/b. The original Fritz 6 is roughly equal to F532. Enrique >in the chessbits-rating list he is 117 points above fritz6! >we do not divide into f6 and f6a and f6b. the games of f6 and f6a are melted >together. i´m not happy with that, but it was not possible to handle in another >way, because fritz saves his games only under fritz 6 and not f6a. > >marcus
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.