Author: José Carlos
Date: 10:12:25 11/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 09, 2000 at 12:55:48, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On November 09, 2000 at 12:49:07, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >ok - next follows a3 a6 game... Your behaviour makes no sense for me. What are you trying to prove: -GT being a good attacker? It seems obvious enough not to need proof. -Crafty being a stupid program? Every programs are stupid in some way, and very "smart" in some other. -GT being smart and Crafty being stupid? If you try to prove something like that, what you're really proving is that you are not an objective person, so your opinions are worthless. -GT being stronger than Crafty? Seems obvious to me. -New paradigm? Poor arguments you use... So please, explain what do you try to proove with these posts. José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.