Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: The Economics of Chess Programming. First Chapter.

Author: Fernando Villegas

Date: 12:44:45 11/09/00


Answering a post, John Merlino talked about the first production run of CM8000:
around, he said, 40 or 50 thousand copies. I believe this is the first figure
related to this industry we have got, since ever. Well, now speculation begins.
First: how many runs along his full life expectancy we can expect for that
product, the more commercially succesfull? I only can guess that maybe there
will be three to four runs a year -five, maybe- but only the first year, then
maybe one or two at most the second, and from then on just the slow selling of
the stock. Second: I can be absolutely mistaken, but I tend to believe that, on
the ground of that initial number given by Merlino, the total market of all
chess programs, including the so called "mass market" programs and also
including even the less known professional, but commercially delivered program,
the total selling is, yearly, no more than 300 to 250 thousands copies. At an
average price of 40 bucks and a presumed profit of, say, 50% of the price, -I am
being generous-, the total net income of chess software industry, each year,
cannot be more than 6 to 8 millions dollars.  Third: that amount is not enough
to sustain the field beyond the very fringe of starvation IF commercially worked
as an specialized market niche. An even companies that produces chess software
AND produces another things, a lot better sallable, does not love to bleed from
a wound even if they have blood enough from other sources. So when you see
somebody getting 8 millions dollars or more, as Chris has done with his Oxford
Softworks, you are looking at a miracle in which Cstal did not play a rol or at
most a very secondary one. Then is when you wonder how is that Ed keeps his
vessel above the water level and even sailing. His is enterily chess dedicated.
He has not, like Oxford Softworks, a wide line of products capable of a more
easy selling. Fourth: I tend to think, then, that chess programming will be more
and more a matter of employees working for big houses that can do good use of
already available resources to fill this tiny market and get some bucks without
too many expenses.  It is the case of Chessmaster.  That's the reason it is sold
and purchased year after year. Conclusion: in the same way independent
programmers cannot become commercials by now, "stand-alone"little companies will
be ousted sooner or later or will never take-off. Price war is a portent of all
that. If you compare current prices in hardware and software chess stuff, you
will see a incredible fast shrinking. Great artisans can sustain themselves very
well with high medieval prices, but cannot even barely live with industrial
prices.
Fernando



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.