Author: Paulo Soares
Date: 13:56:33 11/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2000 at 11:43:50, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On November 08, 2000 at 04:13:30, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 07, 2000 at 22:14:36, Aloisio Ponti Lopes wrote: >> >>>Against that chicken@kasparov we saw playing that match, even old@dement.karpov >>>could win easily... >>> >>>Ferret would win a match against Kramnik, and I also think that Shredder can do >>>that... >>> >>>A. Ponti >> >>I disagree. >> >>I think that losing only 2 games out of 15 against kramnik is an achievment that >>karpov and ferret will be very happy to achieve. >> >>Remember that the same kramnik beated Junior with p700*8 that is clearly better >>hardware than 1Ghz. >> >>Uri > > >I totally agree. losing only two (no wins) would be an outstanding result for >_any_ computer program (possibly excepting DB, where everybody would expect >better). > >Everybody seems to think that chess is nearly solved by Micros. It is barely >understood by them. Their tactical acuity is all that is compensating for their >positional ignorance. Let us suppose that Deeper Blue went a SGm. SGms plays around 50 games a year. That number of games would do that chess players learned about the weaknesses of "SGm" Deeper Blue. In my opinion Deeper Blue, after some time, it would be more vulnerable and, consequently, no longer it would be so strong as in the beginning. Paulo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.