Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 16:43:21 11/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 09, 2000 at 15:24:44, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On November 09, 2000 at 14:55:26, Chris Taylor wrote: > >>Tiger on Athlon 700 >>Chris Taylor. > >why don't you try gambit-tiger ? its stronger... > > shredder4-Tiger2betagambit >80 sh4-gam 0-1 0 - 1 60/60 >81 gam-sh4 1-0 0 - 2 >82 sh4-gam 1-0 1 - 2 >83 gam-sh4 1/2 1.5 - 2.5 >84 sh4-gam 0-1 1.5 - 3.5 >85 gam-sh4 1/2 2 - 4 >86 sh4-gam 0-1 2 - 5 >87 gam-sh4 1/2 2.5 - 5.5 >88 sh4-gam 0-1 2.5 - 6.5 >89 gam-sh4 1-0 2.5 - 7.5 >90 sh4-gam 0-1 2.5 - 8.5 >91 gam-sh4 1-0 2.5 - 9.5 >92 sh4-gam 0-1 2.5 - 10.5 >93 gam-sh4 1-0 2.5 - 11.5 I disagree. Gambit Tiger is weaker than Chess Tiger... I just finihsed a series of games over ICS on FICS vs a Fritz 6 computer. I took the series convincingly.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.