Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 03:12:57 11/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 09, 2000 at 19:43:21, Peter Skinner wrote: >> shredder4-Tiger2betagambit >>80 sh4-gam 0-1 0 - 1 60/60 >>81 gam-sh4 1-0 0 - 2 >>82 sh4-gam 1-0 1 - 2 >>83 gam-sh4 1/2 1.5 - 2.5 >>84 sh4-gam 0-1 1.5 - 3.5 >>85 gam-sh4 1/2 2 - 4 >>86 sh4-gam 0-1 2 - 5 >>87 gam-sh4 1/2 2.5 - 5.5 >>88 sh4-gam 0-1 2.5 - 6.5 >>89 gam-sh4 1-0 2.5 - 7.5 >>90 sh4-gam 0-1 2.5 - 8.5 >>91 gam-sh4 1-0 2.5 - 9.5 >>92 sh4-gam 0-1 2.5 - 10.5 >>93 gam-sh4 1-0 2.5 - 11.5 >I disagree. Gambit Tiger is weaker than Chess Tiger... >I just finihsed a series of games over ICS on FICS vs a Fritz 6 computer. I took >the series convincingly. I have different results, which time control did you use ? Fritz6b - Tiger2beta2gambit 48 f6b-gam 0-1 0 - 1 60/60 49 gam-f6b 0-1 1 - 1 50 f6b-gam 0-1 1 - 2 51 gam-f6b 1-0 1 - 3 52 f6b-gam 0-1 1 - 4 53 gam-f6b 1-0 1 - 5 54 f6b-gam 0-1 1 - 6 55 gam-f6b 1-0 1 - 7 56 f6b-gam 1/2 1.5 - 7.5 57 gam-f6b 0-1 2.5 - 7.5 58 f6b-gam 1/2 3 - 8 59 gam-f6b 1/2 3.5 - 8.5 60 f6b-gam 1-0 4.5 - 8.5 61 gam-f6b 1/2 5 - 9
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.