Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:56:25 11/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2000 at 07:54:44, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On November 09, 2000 at 19:38:42, Uri Blass wrote: >>I think that the last move Kh1 was a mistake and better was Qe7 and white is >>winning for example Qe7 e5 Rg3 exf4 Rg2 Qc3 Rd1 > >ok - Qe7 wins. >I am analyzing in the moment if you can win Kh1 too. I guess that Kh1 is also enough to win but the win by Qe7 is more simple. The point is that there is no reason to avoid winning the endgame. Kh1 was the first wrong move of tiger and it also missed other possibilities to win material(Bg1 was probably better than Kg2) The wrong scores of gambit leaded it to miss a win and a better program than crafty could avoid losing the game against gambit. I am not against speculation but I believe that you should divide the evaluations that are based on these speculation by 2 in order to encourage winning the endgame when it is possible. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.