Author: David Rasmussen
Date: 06:40:11 11/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2000 at 07:46:31, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >I want to explain why i believe this game is a good example. >I have seen many many of those games, with cstal and gambit-tiger. >You say: the evaluation was inflated, the score settled back down. >you say so, as if the score is a graph and has to be a line, that should >come very close to what YOU call "reality". >this idea is the old paradigm. >it's like newton and his believe in a universal-time, that is everywhere the >same, and all we have to do is to adjust our watches to this universal-time >that is the same in the whole universe ! You're an idiot.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.