Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: you can tell whatever you want, i like this game...

Author: Joe Besogn

Date: 07:00:38 11/10/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 10, 2000 at 09:40:11, David Rasmussen wrote:

>On November 10, 2000 at 07:46:31, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>
>>
>>I want to explain why i believe this game is a good example.
>>I have seen many many of those games, with cstal and gambit-tiger.
>>You say: the evaluation was inflated, the score settled back down.
>>you say so, as if the score is a graph and has to be a line, that should
>>come very close to what YOU call "reality".
>>this idea is the old paradigm.
>>it's like newton and his believe in a universal-time, that is everywhere the
>>same, and all we have to do is to adjust our watches to this universal-time
>>that is the same in the whole universe !
>
>You're an idiot.

At this point, I must reveal the NPIRL (New Paradigm Ideas Rating List).

We get a token ELO point increase for any contradiction and content-free insult
from an end-user, hotmail account, yahoo account or previously unknown poster.

We get a five ELO point bonus increase from being called 'mad' by Bob Hyatt.

A massive ten ELO points comes from having an account banned. This is called
'hitting the jackpot', and causes us to have a celebratory swig of our favourite
tipple.

New paradigm, acceptance of ideas thereof, is gradually proven by increasing
irrationality of counter attacks from the old paradigm.

Please keep up the counter attacks.





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.