Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Kuhn - relevence to computer chess -

Author: Joe Besogn

Date: 07:10:14 11/10/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 10, 2000 at 09:58:00, Andrew Williams wrote:

>On November 10, 2000 at 06:25:09, Joe Besogn wrote:
>
>>On November 09, 2000 at 07:06:00, Andrew Williams wrote:
>>>
>>>Let's be clear here.
>>
>>Let's be very clear. I am a grey-blue box, white background covered with black
>>text. I am the thing with which you relate. The relationship with me, the
>>blue-grey box, is the reason you are here. I mean to you whatever you want. I,
>>blue-grey box, have no smell, no sweat, no touch, no sex, no love. I , blue-grey
>>box, cannot damage you, nor be damaged. I am safe. I am no danger. You can
>>relate to me, the blue-grey box, however you want, because I am cannot affect
>>you. You are safe. This is how you want it. Safety from zero contact. Safety
>>from never needing to consider emotionality. This is what you want. All
>>emotionality is off-topic. On-topic is dead machines. How the dead machines
>>work. What happens when the dead machines race in a line together. Dead.
>>
>>Is that clear enough?
>>
>>> You are Chris Whittington, aren't you?
>>
>>No. I am a blue-grey box with blac text on a white background.
>>
>>You are not Andrew Williams. You are a blue-grey box with black text on a white
>>background.
>>
>>Chris Whittington and Andrew Williams are something else. You don't find them
>>here. They are both off-topic. They are alive.
>>
>>Clear enough?
>
>I see. I will take that as a "yes".

Ah, deeply scientific.

I guess it is all a question of what you find important. You know that I know
that you know why you find it important.

It's your game, not mine.


>
>Andrew



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.