Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 07:30:09 11/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2000 at 09:40:11, David Rasmussen wrote: >You're an idiot. :-))) but a very good one :-))) The problem is : you will not make black win or draw the position, no matter what you do. i guess calling me whatever will not change the fact that hiarcs and cstal and gambit-tiger evaluate very high in move 39 and would win this game against you, no matter what you do. if you lose - calling somebody an idiot is just another indicator for how dramatical different this new paradigm is, that the cheerleaders of the old paradigm need to use these words to get rid of the things they don't understand. i have worked many years with chris whittington on the topic, how to make an evaluation-function understand those kind of positions. it's there ! and still you don't see it . bah - how blind can somebody be ?!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.